A A A A Search :
Toledo Talk   (musing about Lake Erie West and beyond)
From JJFad's workspace   

Two Words That Don't Go Together... Congress+Raise

Each day I read the Wall Street Journal, and each day I become more and more numb to the number of stories that carry the tone of an unsettled economy that could break towards a deep recession. The front page of the online WSJ has been filled with stories of market corrections, government over-spending, recession, and companies not living up to earning expectations.

But, hey, that's the rest of America that is detached from the island of Moolah that is located between Virginia and Maryland. In Moolah, the volcanoes erupt with foie gras, waterfalls drip the finest red wines and money trees are harvested to be picked year round. Rumors are even buzzing that in Moolah you can do a very bad job and still get a nice paycheck -- even a raise!

So, maybe Moolah is Wash DC. Maybe the waterfalls are not dripping the finest red wine (but I hear it's still a nice vintage). I'm beginning to wonder if Congressional and Senate paychecks should, in some way, be linked to their inability to produce a balanced budget, reduce taxes and reduce unnecessary spending. In today's economy, should Congress get a raise? If my division of the company continually lost money would I get a raise? Would I even have a job?

With a hearty retirement package and benefits galore, I fail to comprehend the current pay package for Congress -- even before the raise. Congressional members will not move onto a life of financial hardship after their stint in government. I doubt a congressman will be selling their body in airport restrooms to make ends meet...er, well... they shouldn't have to. The connections and networks that are garnered through serving in Congress will, usually, lead to a life of financial freedom.

============================================================================

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Fortunately for members of Congress, their pay isn’t tied to their approval ratings.

Lawmakers in 2008 will receive salaries of $169,300, a boost of $4,100 over the pay they have lived with since January 2006.

That 2.5 percent increase is mirrored by similar raises for associate justices of the Supreme Court, who will see their pay go from $203,000 to $208,100, and Chief Justice John Roberts, whose pay will rise to $217,400 from $212,100.

The salary figures were published in Tuesday’s edition of the Federal Register.

Last year was the first since 1999, when the pay was $136,700, that members of Congress did not receive a cost-of-living allowance raise along with other federal employees. Democrats, newly elected to the majority, had vowed to block an increase in their paychecks until Congress raised the minimum wage.

With the minimum wage increase accomplished last year, House Democratic leaders joined with their Republican counterparts to oppose a procedural vote to bring the COLA issue to the floor, leaving the way clear for their automatic raise.

The congressional COLA is linked, under a complicated formula, to the cost-of-living increase awarded civil servants. As part of a 1989 ethics bill, Congress gave up its ability to accept pay for speeches and made annual cost-of-living pay increases automatic unless lawmakers voted otherwise.

Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, a leading critic of the COLA process, said in an interview that he’s not proposing that members of Congress never get a pay raise. But he said that, in a time of budget deficits when many people are undergoing economic hardships, “at least we ought to have an up-and-down vote on it. The whole process appears so secretive.”

Reluctance to openly discuss the salary issue comes at a time when Congress has been suffering low public approval ratings. In a December AP-Ipsos poll, 25 percent of those surveyed approved of the job Congress was doing.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., will get a pay boost from $212,100 last year to $217,400, the same as Chief Justice Roberts. The majority and minority leaders of the House and Senate and Senate president pro tempore Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., will get increases from $183,500 to $188,100.

Dick Cheney, in his last year as vice president, will receive $221,100, up from $215,700. President Bush’s salary of $400,000 is unchanged.

============================================================================
created by JJFad on Jan 10, 2008 at 01:10:20 am
updated by JJFad on Jan 10, 2008 at 01:15:52 am
    Comments: 4

print      source      versions

Comments ... #

Maybe we ought to hold congress to the same standards we are. Ive worked my ass off for the last few years and due to the increase in my productivity at work, Ive gotten several merit raises.

A couple of them I asked for - I went in, packing the proof of the positive results of my efforts, and basically proved that I was worth the increase I was asking for.

It'd sure be nice if congress could be held to those standards.

posted by billy on Jan 10, 2008 at 09:36:37 am     #



...but Billy, I don't think our congressmen and congresswomen can live on 1.98 a year.

posted by JeepMaker on Jan 10, 2008 at 03:06:42 pm     #



They simply represent people who make similar money and have similar net worths. They hang out with that type of crowd.

There's probably a better source but this might be a clue of how much they need them thur razes:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/13/senators.finances/

posted by charlatan on Jan 10, 2008 at 03:34:48 pm     #



JeepMaker, the US Congress is PACKED with millionaires. They can afford to PAY US for their tenures.

posted by GuestZero on Jan 10, 2008 at 04:39:59 pm     #