A A A A Search :
Toledo Talk   (musing about Lake Erie West and beyond)
From charlatan's workspace   

Tolerable spousal abuse

I remember reading this a few years ago. At the time I thought assaulting a person in power was criminal offense, punishable by years in jail.

http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/editorials/2002/0507a.html

Is There a Batterer in the US Senate?
May 7, 2002
by Glenn J. Sacks

There is a batterer in the United States Senate.

This abuser's spouse has suffered repeated violent attacks, yet there has been no condemnation of this Senator's violence. Ironically, this Senator, who is one of the most controversial people in American public life today, has somehow escaped reproach for the one thing that both detractors and admirers should agree is genuinely inexcusable--domestic violence.

Who is this perpetrator of domestic violence? New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

The evidence against Ms. Clinton is strong. According to Hillary's admiring biographer Gail Sheehy, author of Hillary's Choice, one of the domestic assaults upon Bill Clinton occurred in 1993, when Hillary slashed Bill Clinton's face with her long fingernails, leaving a "mean claw mark along his jawline."

The incident was first explained as a "shaving accident" and a subsequent attempt was made to pin the blame on Socks the cat. Because of the gouge's size, neither explanation was accepted by observers. Dee Dee Myers, the White House spokeswoman at the time, later explained to Sheehy that it had been singer Barbara Streisand's visit to the White House that had sparked Hillary's jealous, violent rage.

According to Christopher Andersen, author of Bill and Hillary, Hillary also assaulted Bill on August 13, 1999, after the Monica Lewinsky revelations. Andersen writes:

"...the President...weeping, begged her forgiveness. Much of what transpired next between Bill and Hillary Clinton was plainly audible to Secret Service agents and household staff members down the hall. In the past, Hillary had thrown books and an ashtray at the President -- both hitting their mark...Hillary rose to her feet and slapped him across the face -- hard enough to leave a red mark that would be clearly visible to Secret Service agents when he left the room.

" 'You stupid, stupid, stupid bastard,' Hillary shouted. Her words, delivered at the shrill, earsplitting level that had become familiar to White House personnel over the years, ricocheted down the corridor."

Sheehy's account of the incident is similar, adding that Hillary's friend Linda Bloodworth-Thomasen, who was staying with her husband in the private quarters nearby, "thought it was great that Hillary 'smacked him upside the head.' "

The US Department of Justice's Office for Victims of Crime classifies these types of attacks--scratching, slapping, hitting, throwing objects, and inflicting bruises or lacerations--as "physical abuse" and domestic violence.

Bill Clinton handled the incidents in a manner eerily reminiscent of the way many female victims of domestic violence did in the pre-feminist era. Ashamed, he tried to cover the incidents up, even ordering his representatives to publicly alibi his wife's violence. He probably blamed himself for "provoking" her, as if marital infidelity warrants physical assault. And he almost certainly never considered calling the police or formally charging his abuser.

The public's reaction has been of the "what did he do to set her off?" variety--a "blame the victim" mentality that would immediately be recognized and condemned were the genders of the perpetrator and victim reversed. Media coverage of the incidents has almost entirely consisted of jokes on late night TV and talk radio. In narrating these assaults, neither Sheehy nor Andersen mention 'domestic violence' or even write disapprovingly of Hillary's attacks. Needless to say, the reaction would be quite different were it the president's wife who appeared in public with lacerations on her face.

Nor were the incidents mentioned during Hillary's 2000 Senate campaign. In fact, it was former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani who was publicly pilloried as a bad spouse for his failing marriage, while the fact that his electoral opponent was a known abuser merited little or no mention.

The Clinton incidents demonstrate that, despite the overwhelming body of research which shows that men and women initiate and engage in domestic violence equally, the public still largely holds the outdated and discredited view that domestic violence is synonymous with wife-beating.

Ironically, Senator Clinton herself has spoken out on domestic violence on many occasions, and has supported the Family Violence Prevention Fund's $100 million anti-Domestic Violence campaign. The campaign's slogan is "There's No Excuse for Domestic Violence."

What's Senator Clinton's excuse?

created by charlatan on Feb 11, 2008 at 08:57:02 pm     Comments: 11

print      source      versions

Comments ... #

Since when have politicians been "role models"? I say reduce term lengths and have them sign an "agenda" when taking office to use as a tool for review and re-election.

posted by tommy1 on Feb 12, 2008 at 12:11:42 am     #



I say take away their cushy pensions, make them have to collect social security and medicare. See how long it takes them to fix it then.

posted by Linecrosser on Feb 12, 2008 at 02:37:54 am     #



The Clintons already gave us 100% proof that their marriage is a joke at worst, and a political arrangement at best (since Americans have a serious mental problem with single politicians). Anyone who tries to take the Royal Couple into court for anything marital will find the matter thrown out on that basis.

posted by GuestZero on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:09:32 am     #



when I first read the title to this post I assumed it was about Carty and Amy...

posted by billy on Feb 12, 2008 at 11:19:50 am     #



Here's a few other links to the story, which seems fairly incredible:

http://www.safe4all.org/essays/victims

http://www.cyberparent.com/abuse/abuseupdate.htm

If the silly bitch ever threw an ashtray at me, I'd slap the crap right out of her.

posted by madjack on Feb 12, 2008 at 06:44:26 pm     #



It'll probably never come to light in TV land because what happens in the white house....

Violence is so diplomatic and stately.

posted by charlatan on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:06:29 pm     #



I don't mean to make light of spousal abuse, and I'm certainly not a violent person by any means.

That being said, if my husband publicly humiliated me in a Lewinsky-esque manner, he'd be lucky if the worst I did was throw an ashtray at his head. lol

(Of course, my husband and I actually have a real marriage, unlike the Clintons.)

posted by mom2 on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:38:19 pm     #



I'm thinking, if Hillary didn't know what her own husband was doing, then how on earth is she supposed to know what's going on in the world?

posted by starling02 on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:38:20 am     #



I think the bigger transgression may be repeatedly dipping one's wedded willy where it doesn't belong, to the very public disgrace of one's wife.

Throwing ashtrays, not good, true. But honestly, I understand where that sort of temporary seething, physical rage could come from. And no, that's not THAT good of an example of the "blame the victim" mentality. Because: Bill Clinton? A victim? In his marriage? Seriously? Only in his own mind and of his own making, if at all. There are rumors that he's played around since his time in the White House and if true, I guess that means that flying ashtrays weren't too big of a deal to him.

Interestingly, there are articles also around that claim HILLARY is the "victim" in the Clintons' marriage; that she suffers (or suffered) spousal abuse. Like this one, which uses the tag and the mentality of an "abused spouse" as the reasoning for why Hillary should not be president.

posted by jmleong on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:38:34 am     #



It's just meaningless sex. Why be so frigid/uptight/violent about it? Most sex is quite meaningless...that's why there are clinics of various sorts and lots of lonely people.

And to paraphrase starling if it was so important to her, then how did she not know? He has people around him 24/7. She probably could have got a few nifty gadgets from 007 or Q.

posted by charlatan on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:21:53 am     #



To be honest...I seriously doubt that either of the Clintons is a true victim of spousal abuse.

Their marriage seems like a business arrangement, and both strike me as the shrewd type to try to milk the public sympathy for everything its worth if he/she really was being abused.

And I do agree with starling that if she didn't know what was going on with her own husband (doubtful!), then how can she be expected to run the country?

posted by mom2 on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:04:48 pm     #