A A A A Search :
Toledo Talk   (musing about Lake Erie West and beyond)
From babbleman's workspace   

Charlie Gibson's Gaffe

Charlie Gibson's Gaffe

by Charles Krauthammer

[Gibson] asked Palin, "Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine?"

She responded, quite sensibly to a question that is ambiguous, "In what respect, Charlie?"

Sensing his "gotcha" moment, Gibson refused to tell her. After making her fish for the answer, Gibson grudgingly explained to the moose-hunting rube that the Bush doctrine "is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense."

There is no single meaning of the Bush Doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.

Wrong.

I know something about the subject because, as the Wikipedia entry on the Bush Doctrine notes, I was the first to use the term.

created by babbleman on Sep 12, 2008 at 06:21:44 pm     Comments: 3

print      source      versions

Comments ... #

Palin should have corrected Gibson on this. Oh, wait....

posted by pink_slip on Sep 12, 2008 at 07:55:34 pm     #



She was a robot (albeit a "wired" one) last night. The debates should be a freak show to say the least.

posted by Ryan on Sep 12, 2008 at 08:06:26 pm     #



If Gibson was not an amateur and a party hack, he wouldn't have gotten his explanation wrong.

posted by AirTrainer on Sep 13, 2008 at 10:11:41 am     #