A A A A Search :
Toledo Talk   (musing about Lake Erie West and beyond)
From Darkseid's workspace   

Alderman wants to put big tax on bottled water (Chicago)

Alderman Wants to Tax Bottled Water
cbs2chicago ^ | 08/14/07

(CBS) CHICAGO Cooling off with bottled water could soon cost you more within the Chicago city limits if one alderman has his way.

As CBS 2's Kristyn Hartman reports, Ald. George Cardenas (12th) wants to slap a tax of up to 25 cents on the cost of every bottle to help close a $217 million budget gap.

“People enjoy jogging or driving with a bottle of water. There’s a cost associated with this behavior. You have to pay for it,” said Cardenas, one of Mayor Richard M. Daley’s staunchest City Council supporters.

Cardenas noted that there’s a nearly $40 million shortfall in the city’s water and sewer funds, in part because of a decline in water usage.

“How is this possible when we have a water system that’s won honors? It’s because bottled water has become a $15 billion industry that’s growing at a rate of 20 to 30 percent a year,” he said.

Cardenas also said a bottled water tax would help the environment by dissuading people from buying the plastic bottles that end up in landfills.

But Chicagoans CBS 2 met on the street early Tuesday did not like the idea of the tax.

"Let them tax cigarettes, not water," said Chicago resident Brian Lynch.

"Ten to 20, that's crazy. It's not cigarettes or anything, it's bottled water, so that's ridiculous," added Chicago resident Lazzerick Young. "I'd probably go towards filtered water, maybe, and not do the bottled water."

"We're going to have to vote him out, because that's not good," said Justina Miles. "I buy a lot of bottled water."

"So raise the taxes on pop. Why would you want to raise it on something that's healthy?" said Dennis Hopkins. "You can give a newborn baby bottled water. It's good for you."

Wendy Abrams, a spokeswoman for the city’s Office of Budget and Management, said the mayor’s budget team will “work with aldermen on any new idea aimed at generating new revenue for the city.” But raising taxes remains a “last resort,” she said.

Many U.S. cities have cut off municipal purchases of bottled water. But Joseph Doss, president of the International Bottled Water Association, said he knows of no other city that has tried to tax bottled water.

"Bottled water is a safe, healthy, convenient beverage that consumers find refreshing. Any action that would discourage consumers from drinking this healthy beverage is a bad idea and not in the public interest," he said.

Doss said the bottled vs. tap argument doesn’t hold water because 75 percent of bottled water consumers drink both. And bottled water companies are attempting to defuse the landfill argument. They’re using much lighter-weight plastics in their containers and have reduced the amount of plastic resin in those bottles by 40 percent over the past five years, he said.

Noting that plastic petroleum containers make up only one-third of 1 percent of the total U.S. waste stream, he said, "Any effort to reduce the environmental impact of packaging must focus on all consumer goods and not just target bottled water or any one industry."

CBS 2's Kristyn Hartman and the STNG Wire contributed to this report.

created by Darkseid on Aug 14, 2007 at 05:31:15 pm     Comments: 9

print      source      versions

Comments ... #

It wouldn't be that Chicago has a nice history of corruption and financial mismanagement.

For a city of 3 million, each person's share is roughly $72 or $13 for the water/sewage part. Not going anywhere with this...

Once you start taxing bottled water, people will move to new products or old standbys like powdered water.

posted by charlatan on Aug 14, 2007 at 06:29:32 pm     #



"Let them tax cigarettes, not water," said Chicago resident Brian Lynch.

The government already taxes cigs. It's time to spread the love to other products, especially dangerous ones like bottled water.

... It’s because bottled water has become a $15 billion industry that’s growing at a rate of 20 to 30 percent a year ...

This cannot be tolerated. It's time to put an end to Big Bottled Water.

"Bottled water is a safe, healthy, convenient beverage that consumers find refreshing. Any action that would discourage consumers from drinking this healthy beverage is a bad idea and not in the public interest," he said.

Wrong and wrong. The debate is over. Bottled water is bad for the environment. So bottled water should be taxed heavily to discourage people from buying it.

If you buy bottled water, you are hurting the unborn because they will some day suffer from the climate changes caused by our actions today. If we're going to be vigilant or militant at stopping global warming or cooling or whatever the hell it's called this week, then it cannot be done half-ass. We can't ban, restrict, and tax some products and activities while allowing others to continue unfettered when these "others" are known to harm the environment as well.

posted by jr on Aug 14, 2007 at 08:57:29 pm     #



Once you start taxing bottled water, people will move to new products or old standbys like powdered water.
----------------------------------

POWDERED WATER!>?! WTF?!>? LOL

posted by Darkseid on Aug 14, 2007 at 10:08:37 pm     #



Add to it another problem, that all the plastic we drink and eat out of contains bisphenol A, a chemical that mimics estrogen in the human body. Similar acting chemical are in the water we drink thanks to industrial farming practices, which include the overuse of weed killers, and farming too close to ditches, streams, lakes, etc. The total burden of farming and CAFOs should be regulated. I do understand a tax on water leaving the great lakes area, and the latest trick is to do it with bottled water, since pipeline exports aren't allowed unless the treated waste water is returned to the lake(s). Bottled water is a way to cheat the rule on water exports, and if you consider that the bottles are made of plastic, its not all that healthy. We need more estrogenic compounds in our food and drink like we need a nice estrogen driven tumor.

posted by prime3end on Aug 15, 2007 at 12:27:29 am     #



The kinds of people who buy bottled water already have no problem getting hosed every time they spend $1 or more for what can be found in quite nearly any building for next to free. So tax it, and repair the damages caused by this foolish product. Hopefully enough people will be discouraged from wasting plastic and transportation costs for what, in many cases, is no different than tap water.

posted by agonotheta on Aug 15, 2007 at 03:09:30 am     #



"Let them tax cigarettes, not water," said Chicago resident Brian Lynch.

And there it is. It was okay when it was them. But now that it's us? Oh hell naw!

posted by TheTalentedMrC on Aug 15, 2007 at 05:37:25 am     #



powered water????

posted by MaggieThurber on Aug 15, 2007 at 06:45:36 am     #



lol

posted by jdmsbyrd on Aug 15, 2007 at 08:28:45 am     #



Tax it, heavily...and start collecting a deposit on the bottles while you're at it.

The average US household has a net negative savings rate, yet Americans have enough walking around money to spend over $10 billion on bottled water.

Sure there's the occasional time and place when it makes sense to buy a bottle, but at a cost of 250 to 10,000 times greater than the cost of an equal amount of tap water??? I'll stick to my nalgene bottles and fill 'em myself.

posted by bam2 on Aug 15, 2007 at 09:34:26 am     #