Article source for : Wikipedia at fault in Microsoft incident
It's nearly impossible for a company to correct blatant mistakes in a Wikipedia article.
Details about the soap opera where Wales and Wikipedia get most of the blame, in my opinion:
"An interesting offer : get paid to contribute to Wikipedia":http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/01/an_interesting_offer.html - by "Rick Jelliffe":http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1712
<q>
Standards activist Rick Jelliffe is C.T.O. of Topologi Pty. Ltd, a company making XML-related desktop tools, and spends most of his time working on editors, validators and publishing-related markup. His main standards project currently is editing an upcoming ISO standard for the Schematron schema language, which he originally developed.
</q>
"Battleground Wikipedia":http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/24/battleground-wikipedia
"How Do We Get Rid of Lies on Wikipedia?":http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=0c22a95a-2d81-4f40-bbce-c763d8447468
"What Is The Check On Wikipedia’s Power?":http://publishing2.com/2007/01/24/what-is-the-check-on-wikipedias-power
"Microsoft in hot water over Wikipedia edits":http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/microsoft.wikipedia.ap
"hi, I'm the guy you're bashing today":http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=218248&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=17724650
"Techmeme aggregation":http://www.techmeme.com/070124/p59#a070124p59
tag=technology
tag=wikipedia
